Hyperoptic broadband vs Sky broadband

Hyperoptic focuses on straightforward full-fibre broadband in connected buildings, with symmetric upload speeds and Wi-Fi 6 routers as standard.

Sky broadband sells full fibre across Openreach and CityFibre networks, with a wider range of packages, Wi-Fi guarantees and discounts when bundling Sky TV.

If you can get both, Sky offers more packages and bundle options, while Hyperoptic offers faster upload speeds.

---

At a glance: Sky vs Hyperoptic

Top picks: Sky and Hyperoptic broadband deals

---

Price

Winner: Sky is cheaper than Hyperoptic at the entry level, and that gap widens if you're an existing Sky TV customer.

Both providers price their 150Mb plans as their effective entry-level deal - Sky's cheaper 75Mb and Hyperoptic's 50Mb plans cost the same as their 150Mb equivalents, so there's no reason to pay for less speed. Sky starts at £24 a month; Hyperoptic at £26, plus a £19 setup fee.

Sky is £2 a month cheaper to start, but Hyperoptic's £19 setup fee versus Sky's refunded £5 means the gap at the point of signing up is more significant.

Over a 24-month contract the difference narrows further. Sky rises by £3 a month from April 2026, then an assumed further £3 from April 2027 - reaching £30 a month by the second year. Hyperoptic rises once, by £4 a month from April 2027.

Based on those assumptions, the total contract cost comes to around £678 with Sky and £687 with Hyperoptic - a difference of just £9 over two years.

At 900Mb, Hyperoptic is currently on a reduced rate of £29 against Sky's £33 - a £4 gap. Hyperoptic's 500Mb plan sits at £31, so that price is likely to increase once the offer ends.

The WiFi add-on comparison is more one-sided than the price suggests. Sky's WiFi Max costs £4 a month and includes up to three mesh pods, with a speed guarantee of at least 25Mbps per room on 150Mb plans and above. Hyperoptic's add-on is £7 a month for a single booster, with no guarantee attached. For anyone in a larger home or with dead spots to cover, Sky's option is the stronger and cheaper choice.

On calls, both providers include a home phone line with pay-as-you-go calls as standard - so casual users won't pay extra either way. Regular callers will find Hyperoptic cheaper, at £7 a month in total for anytime UK landline calls, against Sky's £17. The catch is that Hyperoptic's plan doesn't cover calls to UK mobiles, which Sky's does - something worth checking against your actual calling habits before assuming Hyperoptic is the better deal.

The picture shifts most dramatically for existing Sky TV customers. Bundling broadband with Sky TV can bring the effective broadband cost down to £17 to £20 a month - undercutting Hyperoptic's entry price outright. Hyperoptic has no TV service to bundle, so this discount simply isn't available to them.

For most households taking broadband only, the two providers end up remarkably close over a full contract term - around £9 apart over two years on current assumptions. Sky edges it on standalone price, offers the stronger WiFi guarantee, and holds a clear advantage for anyone already paying for Sky TV.

---

Broadband packages

Winner: Sky offer more standard and premium features than Hyperoptic, including parental controls, a WiFi guarantee and discounts on Sky TV. Hyperoptic offer more contract flexibility, but less in the way of extras.

Sky and Hyperoptic cover the same core speed tiers, but diverge on what comes with them. The key differences are:

• Contract flexibility - Hyperoptic offer 12-month and 30-day rolling contracts alongside the standard 24-month term. Sky is 24 months only.
• WiFi guarantee - Sky's WiFi Max adds up to three mesh pods and a whole-home speed guarantee for £4 a month. Hyperoptic's Total WiFi is one booster, no guarantee, at £7 a month.
• Parental controls - Sky include Sky Broadband Shield free with all packages, plus enhanced app-based controls with WiFi Max. Hyperoptic's Zyxel router has basic scheduling and URL filtering, but no managed service or app.
• TV bundles - Sky broadband can be bundled with Sky TV for significant discounts. Hyperoptic has no TV service.

Here are their main broadband packages side-by-side:

Hyperoptic's contract flexibility is a genuine advantage for anyone not ready to commit to two years - a 30-day rolling contract is rare among mainstream providers, and the price premium for it is modest.

A home phone line is included as standard with Sky, with pay-as-you-go calls at no extra cost. Hyperoptic charge £4 a month to add a line - worth factoring in if you're comparing headline prices. Anytime UK landline calls are £7 a month in total with Hyperoptic, against £17 a month with Sky, though Sky's plan covers calls to UK mobiles, which Hyperoptic's does not. For households that still make regular calls, the right choice depends on whether mobile calls are part of that habit.

Sky's WiFi Max add-on costs £4 a month and includes up to three mesh pods, a whole-home speed guarantee of 25Mbps per room on Full Fibre 150 and above, the Sky Max Hub router upgrade for customers who don't already have it, free off-peak engineer visits, and 2GB of Sky Mobile data for qualifying outages. Hyperoptic's Total WiFi is £7 a month for a single booster with no speed guarantee - more expensive, and considerably less comprehensive.

For families, the parental control gap is significant. Sky Broadband Shield is included free with all Sky broadband packages and works at network level, blocking harmful content across every device in the home - no setup required. Customers who take WiFi Max gain a further layer through the MySky app, with device-level scheduling, individual profiles, and the ability to pause internet access on specific devices.

Hyperoptic's Zyxel router does include basic parental controls - schedules and URL filtering per device via the router's web interface - but it requires manual configuration and there's no dedicated app or managed service. For households with younger children, the difference in day-to-day usability is substantial.

Sky TV customers get the most from bundling. Sky Essential TV and Sky Ultimate TV both unlock discounted broadband, bringing the effective monthly cost down to £17 to £20 a month. Sky Ultimate TV now also bundles Netflix, Disney+, HBO Max and hayu from £24 a month - making it one of the most comprehensive TV and broadband packages available in the UK. Hyperoptic has no TV service, so none of this applies.

Outside of contract flexibility, Sky's package is more capable at every level - better WiFi, stronger parental controls, an included phone line, and a TV ecosystem that rewards loyalty with lower prices.

Read more in our full reviews of Hyperoptic broadband and Sky broadband.

---

Broadband speed

Winner: Sky offer faster top speeds than Hyperoptic in CityFibre areas, reaching up to 5Gbps. Hyperoptic top out at 900Mb, but offer symmetrical uploads across most of their range.

Sky broadband runs on Openreach FTTP, which passes over 20 million premises, and on CityFibre, which covers around 4.7 million. Hyperoptic run their own independent full fibre network across 1.9 million premises - predominantly apartment buildings in urban areas.

Since June 2025, Hyperoptic have also begun reselling on the Openreach network, initially covering around 1 million additional homes. If you're comparing the two, you're likely in an area where both are available - and that's where the comparison gets interesting.

On Openreach - where most customers will be - both providers top out at 900Mb downloads. The real difference at this tier is uploads. Sky's Gigafast plan averages just 90Mbps up against 900Mb down.

Hyperoptic offer symmetrical uploads from their Superfast tier upwards, so a 150Mb plan gets 150Mb both ways, and their 900Mb plan matches that on upload too. That matters more than most people realise - video calls, cloud backups, and working from home all depend on upload speed, and Sky's asymmetrical ceiling can become a bottleneck for heavier users.

In CityFibre areas, the picture shifts in Sky's favour. Sky offer 2.2Gbps and 5Gbps plans with symmetrical uploads - speeds that Hyperoptic simply can't match. These are overkill for most households today, but for those who want headroom, or who are future-proofing a busy connected home, Sky's CityFibre plans are in a different league.

Here are the average speeds of Hyperoptic's broadband plans:

And those of Sky broadband on Openreach:

And Sky on CityFibre:

Minimum broadband speeds

Minimum speed guarantees set the floor below which a provider promises speeds won't fall - and if they do, customers can exit their contract without penalty.

Both providers offer a meaningful guarantee, but they work differently. Hyperoptic guarantee their advertised average speed as the minimum - unusually strong, and well above what most providers commit to.

Sky's minimums are set lower than their averages, but their guarantee comes with a financial remedy: if the promised speed isn't met, customers can claim one month's broadband subscription back, and where the guarantee can't be resolved, Sky allow customers to cancel without early termination charges. While Sky is a signatory of Ofcom's code of conduct on broadband speeds, Hyperoptic isn't - though in practice their speed floor goes further.

Hyperoptic's minimum download speeds are:

Sky's minimum download speeds at one tested location are:

Sky's minimums are considerably lower than their averages - at the gigabit tier, the guaranteed floor is 600Mb against a 900Mb average. Hyperoptic's guarantee matches their advertised speed at every tier, so what you sign up for is what you're guaranteed to get.

Sky's compensation model is more consumer-friendly if things go wrong, but Hyperoptic's higher floor means things are less likely to go wrong in the first place.

Sky win on outright top speed in CityFibre areas, and sheer availability on Openreach. For upload performance and speed reliability, Hyperoptic are the stronger choice - though far fewer households can actually get them.

---

Router

Winner: It's a tie. Both Sky and Hyperoptic include a WiFi 6 router as standard, with Sky offering a WiFi 7 upgrade on CityFibre multi-gigabit plans.

All Sky full fibre broadband packages come with the Sky Max Hub, a dual-band WiFi 6 router launched in July 2023. Hyperoptic upgraded their hardware in July 2024, rolling out the Zyxel EX3301 Hyperhub - also a dual-band WiFi 6 device - to all customers, with existing customers eligible for a free upgrade on renewal.

On paper, the specs are close. Both support the 802.11ax WiFi 6 standard, mesh networking, WPA3 security, and four gigabit Ethernet ports. The Sky Max Hub has a clear antenna advantage - eight internal antennas with 4x4 MU-MIMO on both bands, against the Zyxel EX3301's four antennas and 2x2 MU-MIMO. In practice, that means Sky's router handles congested households and multiple simultaneous connections more efficiently, though for most everyday use both will perform comparably.

Here's how the two routers compare side-by-side:

The more meaningful difference is in the WiFi add-ons. Sky's WiFi Max costs £4 a month and includes up to three mesh pods and a whole-home speed guarantee. Hyperoptic's Total WiFi is £7 a month for a single booster with no guarantee. For larger homes, Sky's option is considerably better value.

Customers on Sky's Superfast or part fibre plans receive the older Sky Broadband Hub - a WiFi 5 device - unless they take the WiFi Max add-on, which triggers an upgrade to the Sky Max Hub as part of the service.

In CityFibre areas, Sky's 2.5Gbps and 5Gbps Gigafast+ plans come with the Sky Gigafast+ Hub - a WiFi 7 tri-band router with 10Gbps Ethernet ports and WiFi Max included at no extra cost. It's a significant step up, but only relevant to customers on those premium plans. Hyperoptic has no equivalent.

For the vast majority of customers, both providers deliver comparable WiFi 6 hardware. Sky's antenna advantage and cheaper mesh add-on give it a slight edge in day-to-day use, but not enough to call a clear winner at this tier.

---

Call plans

Winner: Hyperoptic's call plans are cheaper than Sky's across the board, though customers who make regular calls to mobiles will find the options more limited.

Sky includes a home phone line with pay-as-you-go calls as standard across all broadband packages. Hyperoptic's phone line is an add-on at £4 a month. That difference is worth factoring in before comparing the call plan prices themselves.

Where Hyperoptic pull ahead is on anytime UK landline calls, at just £3 a month extra - bringing the total to £7 a month for line and unlimited landline calls. Sky's equivalent Talk Anytime plan costs £17 a month and covers both landlines and mobiles, but that's a significant premium for customers who rarely call mobile numbers.

Here are Hyperoptic's calling plan options:

And Sky's:

The tables tell the story clearly: Hyperoptic is the cheaper choice at every tier for landline-focused callers. The gap at the anytime tier is particularly stark - £7 a month in total with Hyperoptic against £17 with Sky.

The caveat is mobile calls. Hyperoptic don't offer a fully inclusive mobile plan - the closest option is their UK Mobile Plan, which provides a 50% discount on calls to mobiles rather than inclusive minutes. For households that regularly call mobile numbers, Sky's Talk Anytime or Talk Evenings & Weekends plans cover both landlines and mobiles in one straightforward package.

Out-of-allowance call rates also differ considerably. Sky charges 27p per minute plus a 25p connection fee for calls outside the plan allowance. Hyperoptic charges a 10p connection fee, 7p per minute to UK landlines and 17p per minute to UK mobiles - cheaper across the board, and a further reason to favour Hyperoptic for occasional callers who don't want a monthly plan. See our guide to cheapest home phone and landline calls for a full comparison.

For most households, Hyperoptic is the better deal on calls - particularly those who make occasional landline calls or can manage without inclusive mobile minutes. Sky is the stronger choice only for heavy mobile callers who want everything covered in one plan.

---

Customer service

Winner: Sky have some of the lowest complaint figures in the broadband market, and a strong record for complaints handling. Hyperoptic are well-regarded but fall outside Ofcom's reporting threshold.

Comparing these two providers on customer service is not straightforward, because the data available is very different in scope. Sky is one of the most measured providers in the UK - Ofcom publish quarterly complaints data, annual satisfaction research, and call handling metrics covering Sky specifically. Hyperoptic, with a customer base below Ofcom's 1.5% market share reporting threshold, doesn't feature in any of that data.

What we can say about Sky is backed by consistent independent evidence. In Ofcom's Q3 2025 complaints data, Sky recorded just 6 complaints per 100,000 customers - well below the industry average of 8, and among the lowest of any major provider. Plusnet edged ahead at 4 per 100,000 in the most recent quarter, but Sky has held the lowest or joint-lowest position among major providers for most of the past four years.

They also score above average for complaints handling satisfaction. In Ofcom's 2025 Comparing Customer Service report, 63% of Sky customers were satisfied with how their complaint was dealt with - above the industry average of 58%, and behind only EE and Plusnet at 66% and 65% respectively.

Sky's call centre model is mixed - some UK-based teams, alongside overseas support - which is worth knowing if UK-based service is a priority for you. Hyperoptic handles the majority of its customer service from Serbia. For a full breakdown of which providers offer UK-based support, see our guide to broadband providers with UK call centres.

For Hyperoptic, the picture comes from third-party sources. Their Trustpilot score sits at 4.6 out of 5 from over 49,000 reviews - an Excellent rating, with the majority of reviewers giving 5 stars. They've also won ISPA awards for Best Consumer ISP, with judging criteria covering complaint handling speed, agent training, and overall culture of customer satisfaction. That's a credible track record for a provider of their size, even without Ofcom data to benchmark it.

The gap between the two ultimately comes down to evidence. Sky's customer service performance is independently verified, consistently strong, and covers multiple service areas. Hyperoptic's reputation is positive but harder to quantify. For customers who want reassurance before signing a 24-month contract, Sky's record is the more substantial case. See our full guide to broadband providers with the best customer service for more detail.

---

Verdict: Sky or Hyperoptic for broadband?

Overall winner: Sky beat Hyperoptic for most households, but Hyperoptic holds a genuine advantage for upload-heavy users and those who want flexibility.

Sky and Hyperoptic are closer than the headline differences suggest. Both offer full fibre broadband, WiFi 6 routers as standard, a home phone option, and gigabit speeds. The gap between them widens when you look at the extras - and that's where Sky builds its case.

On price, Sky is cheaper to start and the total contract cost works out broadly similar over 24 months once setup fees and annual rises are factored in. For anyone already paying for Sky TV, the bundle discounts make Sky the clear value winner - broadband can effectively cost as little as £17 to £20 a month, which Hyperoptic simply can't compete with.

Sky broadband is the stronger choice for:

• Price - cheaper entry-level monthly cost, and TV bundle customers pay less overall
• Customer service - independently verified low complaint levels and strong handling satisfaction in Ofcom data
• WiFi guarantee - WiFi Max costs £4 a month for up to three mesh pods and a whole-home speed guarantee; Hyperoptic's equivalent is £7 for one booster with no guarantee
• TV bundles - Sky TV customers unlock significant broadband discounts unavailable with Hyperoptic

Hyperoptic broadband is the better choice for:

• Symmetrical uploads - from the Superfast tier upwards, upload speeds match downloads; ideal for working from home, video calls, or uploading large files
• Contract flexibility - 12-month and 30-day rolling contracts available; Sky is 24 months only
• Speed guarantee - Hyperoptic guarantee their advertised average speed as the minimum; Sky's guaranteed floor is considerably lower

For most households - especially those wanting parental controls, whole-home WiFi, or a TV bundle - Sky is the more well-rounded package. Hyperoptic earns its place for upload-dependent users, renters, or anyone not ready to commit to two years. Both are strong providers; the right choice depends on what you actually need from your broadband.

For more comparisons, see our guides to Hyperoptic vs BT, Hyperoptic vs Virgin Media, and Sky vs EE.